Filter cases by:
Barrister
- Desmond Browne CBE KC
- Justin Rushbrooke KC
- Adrienne Page KC
- Andrew Caldecott KC
- Tom Blackburn SC
- Alexandra Marzec
- David Sherborne
- Jonathan Barnes KC
- Godwin Busuttil
- Adam Wolanski KC
- William Bennett KC
- Christina Michalos KC
- Jacob Dean KC
- Adam Speker KC
- Richard Munden
- David Hirst
- Victoria Simon-Shore
- Victoria Jolliffe
- Felicity McMahon
- Chloe Strong
- Gervase de Wilde
- Julian Santos
- Greg Callus
- John Stables
- Ben Hamer
- Patrick Milmo KC
- Professor Tony Smith
- Patrick McCafferty QC
Mardas v New York Times; Mardas v International Herald Tribune
Defamation - Libel - Abuse of process - Internet publication - Forum non conveniens - Prior publication of defamatory allegations
John v Guardian News & Media Ltd
Defamation – Libel – Meaning – Ruling on meaning – Whether words capable of bearing contended meaning – Comment
Crossley & Crossley v Newsquest (Midlands South) Limited
Libel – Privacy - Summary judgment – Absolute privilege – Qualified privilege – Fair comment – Malice – Abuse of process - Newspaper article reporting neighbours’ dispute
Tycon Energy Corp v The Motley Fool Limited
Defamation - Libel - Internet postings - Norwich Pharmacal order - Anonymous representations by posters - Costs
Tiscali UK Ltd v British Telecommunications Plc
Libel - Meaning - Innuendo - Whether words capable of bearing defamatory meanings
Briscoe Mitchell v Hodder & Stoughton Ltd & Anr, Associated Newspapers Limited (non-party)
Defamation action – Witness summons – Non-party disclosure – CPR 31.17
Clarke t/a Elumina Iberica UK v Bain & Prolink Holdings Corp
Defamation - Libel - Jurisdiction - Foreign publication - Aggravated damages - Striking out - Case management - Proportionality
Mireskandari v Associated Newspapers Ltd
Defamation - Extension of Time for Service of a Defence - Solicitors duty to make own investigation of facts independent of their client
H v Tomlinson
Privacy - Human Rights Act claim for an Article 8 right to reputation - Defamation - Justification - Common sting
Hayter v Fahie
Defamation - Libel - Qualified privilege - Malice - Summary judgment
Club La Costa (UK) PLC v (1) Toby Gebhard (2) Inventory Solutions (UK) Limited
Defamation - offer of amends - s. 2 Defamation Act 1996 - qualified privilege
Hughes v Alan Dick & Co Ltd
Defamation - Slander - Absolute privilege - Qualified privilege - Malice - Default judgment - Setting aside - CPR r.13.3(1)
Hussein v Farooq & Sheik
Defamation - Slander - Adequacy of evidence - Proof of oral publication - Slander actionable without proof of special damage
Brady v Norman
Defamation - Libel - Qualified privilege - Defamatory meaning - Internet publication - Trade journal
Apsion v The Bar Standards Board
Appeal from the Disciplinary Tribunal of the Council of the Inns of Court - Whether Tribunal had been correct to conclude that the appellant did not have sufficient competence or expertise to advise in a defamation claim - Whether the charges infringed the Appellant's Art 10 rights
Crossley & Anor v Wallace & Anor
Defamation - libel - abuse of process - no reasonable basis for bringing a claim - review of Master's decision under CPR 3.4(2)(a) and (b) - ruling on meaning
Gentoo Group Ltd (formerly Sunderland Housing Co Ltd) v Hanratty
Defamation - Libel - Harassment - Mode of trial - Judge and jury - Prolonged examination of documents - s.69 Supreme Court Act 1981
Berezovsky v Russian State Television & Another
Defamation - Libel - Foreign broadcaster - Jurisdiction - Fair trial - Defence not justiciable - Anonymity of sources - s.10 Contempt of Court Act 1981
Tesco Stores Ltd v Guardian News & Media Ltd and Rusbridger
Defamation – Libel – Malicious falsehood - Offer of amends – Stay – Burstein plea - Amendments
Smith v ADVFN Plc & Ors (No 2)
Defamation - Libel - Stay - Postings on internet bulletin board - Whether to be treated as libels or slanders
Applause Store Productions Ltd & Firsht v Raphael
Libel - Privacy - Internet publication - Social networking website - Quantum
Ewing v News International & Ors
Vexatious litigant - Leave to bring proceedings - Media organisations - Defamation - Libel - Harassment - Privacy - Chilling effect - Disproportionality
Warren v The Random House Group Ltd (Nos.1-3) (CA)
Defamation – Libel – Offer of Amends – Defamation Act 1996 – Justification – Articles 6 & 10 ECHR - Burstein particulars – Aggravated damages – Disclosure – Lucas Box meaning - Polly Peck – Severable and distinct charges
Radu v Houston & Another (No.3) (CA)
Defamation - Libel - Reynolds privilege - Public interest - Obtaining comment - Gist of claimant's position
Westcott v Westcott (CA)
Defamation - Libel - Slander - Defences - Absolute privilege - Whether complaints to police are covered by absolute or qualified privilege - Preliminary issue
Mond & Ors v Mason & Ors
Libel - Malicious falsehood - Causing loss by unlawful means - Freezing order - Good arguable case - Real risk of removal or disposal of assets - Injunction restraining publication
Kieren Fallon v MGN Limited (No 3)
Justification of Level 2 Meaning - Reasonable Grounds to suspect the Claimant of complicity in race-fixing - Whether adverse expert evidence on manner of Claimant's race riding is essential to the viability of the Defence
Bray v Deutsche Bank AG
Defamation - Libel - Qualified privilege - Malice - Anonymity of witnesses
Alitha Publishing Ltd & Constantinides v Cyprus
Defamation - Article 10 - Reynolds privilege - Responsible journalism - Justification - Fair comment - Qualified privilege - Burdens of proof - Article 8
Atlantis World Group of Companies NV & Another v Gruppo Editoriale L’Espresso SpA
Libel - foreign magazine - English publication - small circulation - foreign claimant - corporate claims - proof of reputation - reference - "Jameel" abuse of process
Curistan v Times Newspapers Ltd (CA)
Defamation - Libel - Meaning - Qualified privilege - Repetition rule - Single-meaning rule - Preliminary issue
Gur v Avrupa Newspaper Ltd & Anor (CA)
Defamation - Libel - Damages - Article 6, ECHR - Reference to personal injury awards
Seray-Wurie v Charity Commission of England and Wales
Defamation - Striking out - Summary judgment - Qualified privilege - Malice
Smith v ADVFN Plc (CA)
Defamation - Norwich Pharmacal disclosure – Defamatory material on bulletin board
Gentoo Group Ltd (formerly Sunderland Housing Co Ltd) v Hanratty
Libel - Disapplication of limitation period - s.32A, Limitation Act 1980 - Discretion - Abuse of process
Kulis v Poland
Human rights - Freedom of expression - Article 10, European Convention on Human Rights - Defamation - Publication of interview - Politician - Matter of public interest - Fact/value judgment dichotomy
Sharma v Singh & Associated Newspapers (No. 2)
Anonymity of witnesses - Allegations of sexual harassment - CPR 39.2(4) - Libel trial
Rath v Guardian News & Media Limited & Anor
Libel - Striking out - Summary judgment - Defence - Justification - Severable and distinct allegation - Fair comment - Error in facts stated - s.6 Defamation Act 1952 - Damages - Reliance on other articles publishing similar allegations
W v JH & A County Council Limited
Libel – Summary judgment – Qualified privilege – ‘Off the peg’ privilege – Lapse of time - Data Protection Act 1998 - Criminal Justice Act 2003
Adelson v Associated Newspapers Ltd (No 3)
Libel - Stay - Striking out - Open offer to settle - Abuse of process - Proportionality - Damages - Vindication - Statement in open court - Costs
Freer v Zeb & Ors
Defamation - Slander - Publication - Summary Judgment - Abuse of process - Vicarious liability - Civil restraint orders
Ivereigh v Associated Newspapers Ltd
Witness anonymity - inherent jurisdiction - CPR 39.2(4) - interests of witness and her children - private and family life - open justice - balancing - intense focus - order granted
Jeynes v News Magazines Limited & Anor
Libel – Defamatory meaning - Whether words complained of capable of bearing pleaded meaning
Seaga v Harper
Defamation - Slander - Defences - Qualified privilege - Reynolds privilege - Statement by politician - Application of Reynolds privilege to non-media publication
Trumm v Norman
Defamation - Libel – Qualified privilege – Meaning – Damages –Assessment of damages
Akinleye v East Sussex Hospitals NHS Trust
Summary judgment - Part 24 - Defamation - Qualified privilege - Malice - Dominant motive - No honest belief in truth - Evidence of malice
Condé Nast Publications Ltd & Anor v UK
Human rights - Right to fair trial - Right to freedom of expression - Arts 6, 10, 18, ECHR - Civil procedure - Video conference link - Defamation - Claimant in libel proceedings giving evidence by video conference link